Government CHINA CORONAVIRUS Mind Control Facemask REQUIRED

Government CHINA CORONAVIRUS  Mind Control Facemask REQUIRED

THERE IS NO Evidence that surgical earloop masks - N95 - are effective at stopping viral transmission.

The wearing of a cloth mask, N95 mask DOES NOTHING TO PROTECT YOU OR OTHERS FROM THE CHINA CORONAVIRUS.

Several Parishes and Businesses in Louisiana and the United States are Requiring the wearing of a "face mask - ie; CHINA Corornvirus COVID-19". I along with my wife WILL NOT wear the "government mind control mask. I have a medical disability (issued by a Medical Doctor and the State of Louisiana Motor Vehicle Division, COPD/Asthma, Blood Disease - Polycythemia, Secondary to Lung Damage from Phosgene Gas Exposure from 1991 to 1998. My wife will not wear the mask, because there IS NO Scientific or Medical Proof the "mask" is of any use... My wife and I are retired and Love going to the L'Auberge Casino in Baton Rouge. A couple of weeks ago, the Casino, State or Local Government-Mandated that ALL patrons to the casino are REQUIRED to Wear a "face mask - ie; CHINA Corornvirus COVID-19".

I WISH PEOPLE WOULD JUST BE HONEST ABOUT THE WEARING OF THE CORONAVIRUS MASK.

You're not wearing a mask out of some noble notion that you're doing your part in protecting anyone from anything.
You're wearing a mask for one of two reasons:
The first is you're a sheep who is just conforming to what everyone else is doing.
The second is, you bought the manufactured fear they sold you about the coronavirus.

You're a scared drone perpetuating this insane notion that being brainwashed, fearful and sacrificing freedom somehow makes you a righteous and upstanding citizen.

A Coronavirus Mask DOES NOTHING TO PROTECT YOU OR ANYONE ELSE FROM THE CHINA CORONAVIRUS.

To Put Things in Perspective;

1. The width a sheet of toilet paper is 100,000 nm thick.

2. A human hair is approximately 75,000 nm thick.

3. An antibody is 10 nm thick.

4. Oxygen is 0.1 nm thick.

5. The Coronavirus cell is 120 nm thick.

Objects that small require scanning electron microscopy to be seen.

LET'S DON'T FORGET THAT THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS CAN BE TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE EYES BECAUSE OF A PROTEIN KNOWN AS THE “GATEWAY” INTO CELLS INSIDE THE BODY.

A team of researchers from the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine have found that the eyes create the protein called ACE-2, making them a target for the virus. The protein also can be found in the respiratory tract and the lungs.

“Ocular surface cells including conjunctiva are susceptible to infection by SARS-CoV-2, and could, therefore, serve as a portal of entry as well as a reservoir for person-to-person transmission of this virus,”.

The researchers studied 10 eyes from people who did not die of COVID-19 and discovered that ACE2 was present in all of them, including the cornea, inside the eyelids and in the white of the eye. “Infection of ocular surface cells could lead to the eye as being an important carrier, with ocular virus shedding constituting a significant mechanism for infection of other individuals.” The study suggests that if droplets from an infected person’s sneeze or cough were to reach the eye’s tissue, the pathogen could begin infiltrating cells there.

This may be why some COVID-19 patients have developed conjunctivitis, an inflammation of the eye that causes it to become red and infected. Tears also may help spread the infection. Doctors first claimed the virus could be spread through the eyes in January, when the epicenter was still in Wuhan, China.

Respirator Rating Number Class N95- Removes 95% of all particles that are at least 300 nm in diameter (Remember, The Coronavirus cell is 120 nm thick, 2.5 times smaller than the Class N95 Respirator can remove) N99- Removes 99% of particles that are at least 300 nm in diameter N100- Removes 99.97% of all particles that are 300 nm in diameter or larger.

Ambient air typically consists of 78% nitrogen and 21% oxygen. The extra 1% is a combination of carbon, helium, methane, argon and hydrogen. The closer the air is to sea level, the higher the percentage of oxygen.

OSHA's requirement for breathing air to have at least 19.5 percent oxygen content. When you are wearing an N95 mask you are exhaling CO2 into the mask and it is being trapped.

OSHA's requirement for breathing air is to have at least 19.5 percent oxygen content, when wearing a non-air supply mask, you are re-breathing the CO2 you exhale. Through the COVID-19 crisis, many have become familiar with N95 masks, which filter out 95 percent or more of small particulate matter from the air – including the virus. But in filtering those particles, the mask also makes it harder to breathe. N95 masks are estimated to reduce oxygen intake by anywhere from 5 to 20 percent.

If you take a CO2 meter and place the sampling tube underneath the mask near your mouth where you exhale, within a few seconds, you will get a reading of over 8000 ppm and Max out the meter within a few seconds.

The average ambient level of CO2 in an average house or business is about 400 ppm. The average CO2 monitor in a house or business is calibrated to disregard the 400 ppm ambient average CO2 and will ALARM once the CO2 meter has detected about 50 to 75 ppm with a weighted daily average & within about 2 to 5 minutes if the CO2 concentration Is detected at 300 to 400 ppm.

If the Liberal Government told you that you could get the Coronavirus via your Anal opening & the only way to STOP THE SPREAD OF THE CHINA CORONAVIRUS WAS TO STICK YOUR FINGER OR SOME SIMILAR DEVICE UP YOUR A$$ 24/7 until a Vaccine was developed and approved, would you comply with the Government Mandate as you do with the Coronavirus mask?

There is NO AUTHORITY in the United States Constitution that Authorizes "government" to stick a needle, force you to wear a "face mask - ie; CHINA Corornvirus COVID-19" or track your daily movements; ie - Cell Phone Applications Software installed by order of government entities via cell phone manufacturers under the name of " COVID-19 Exposure Logging" on the iPhone in the; Settings, Privacy, Health as a Secret, Clandestine or Covert ·Application, AGAINST an American Citizens Will. Anyone who states an American Citizen has no Right to avoid these Infringements AGAINST The American Citizens' RIGHTS, fundamentally Misunderstands The United States Constitution NINTH AMENDMENT: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. The Federalists contended that a bill of rights was unnecessary. They responded to those opposing ratification of the Constitution because of the lack of a declaration of fundamental rights by arguing that, inasmuch as it would be impossible to list all rights, it would be dangerous to list some and thereby lend support to the argument that government was unrestrained as to those rights not listed. Madison adverted to this argument in presenting his proposed amendments to the House of Representatives. It has been objected also against a bill of rights, that, by enumerating particular exceptions to the grant of power, it would disparage those rights which were not placed in that enumeration; and it might follow by implication, that those rights which were not singled out, were intended to be assigned into the hands of the General Government, and were consequently insecure. This is one of the most plausible arguments I have ever heard against the admission of a bill of rights into this system; but, I conceive, that it may be guarded against. I have attempted it, as gentlemen may see by turning to the last clause of the fourth resolution. It is clear from its text and from Madison’s statement that the Amendment states but a rule of construction, making clear that a Bill of Rights might not by implication be taken to increase the powers of the national government in areas not enumerated, and that it does not contain within itself any guarantee of a right or a proscription of an infringement.

The Ninth Amendment had been mentioned infrequently in decisions of the Supreme Court until it became the subject of some exegesis by several of the Justices in Griswold v. Connecticut. The Court in that case voided a statute prohibiting use of contraceptives as an infringement of the right of marital privacy. Justice Douglas, writing for the Court, asserted that the specific guarantees in the Bill of Rights have penumbras, formed by emanations from those guarantees that help give them life and substance. Thus, although privacy is not mentioned in the Constitution, it is one of the values served and protected by the First Amendment through its protection of associational rights, and by the Third, the Fourth, and the Fifth Amendments as well. The Justice recurred to the text of the Ninth Amendment, apparently to support the thought that these penumbral rights are protected by one Amendment or a complex of Amendments despite the absence of a specific reference. Justice Goldberg, concurring, devoted several pages to the Amendment.

The language and history of the Ninth Amendment reveal that the Framers of the Constitution believed that there are additional fundamental rights, protected from governmental infringement, which exist alongside those fundamental rights specifically mentioned in the first eight constitutional amendments. . . . To hold that a right so basic and fundamental and so deep-rooted in our society as the right of privacy in marriage may be infringed because that right is not guaranteed in so many words by the first eight amendments to the Constitution is to ignore the Ninth Amendment and to give it no effect whatsoever. Moreover, a judicial construction that this fundamental right is not protected by the Constitution because it is not mentioned in explicit terms by one of the first eight amendments or elsewhere in the Constitution would violate the Ninth Amendment. . . . Nor do I mean to state that the Ninth Amendment constitutes an independent source of right protected from infringement by either the States or the Federal Government. Rather, the Ninth Amendment shows a belief of the Constitution’s authors that fundamental rights exist that are not expressly enumerated in the first eight amendments and an intent that the list of rights included there not be deemed exhaustive.

Therefore, although neither Douglas’ nor Goldberg’s opinion sought to make the Ninth Amendment a substantive source of constitutional guarantees, both read it as indicating a function of the courts to interpose a veto over legislative and executive efforts to abridge other fundamental rights. Both opinions seemed to concur that the fundamental right claimed and upheld was derivative of several express rights and, in this case, really, the Ninth Amendment added almost nothing to the argument. But, if there is a claim of a fundamental right that cannot reasonably be derived from one of the provisions of the Bill of Rights, even with the Ninth Amendment, how is the Court to determine, first, that it is fundamental, and second, that it is protected from abridgment?

Reference: https://www.osha.gov/.../standardinterpretat.../2007-04-02-0
OSHA - https://www.osha.gov/.../standardinterpretat.../2007-04-02-0

Confined Space Standard, 29 CFR 1910.146, Paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of the Respiratory Protection Standard considers any atmosphere with an oxygen level below 19.5 percent to be oxygen-deficient and immediately dangerous to life or health. To ensure that employees have a reliable source of air with an oxygen content of at least 19.5 percent, paragraphs (d)(2)(i)(A) and (d)(2)(i)(B) of the Respiratory Protection Standard require employers working under oxygen-deficient conditions to provide their employees with a self-contained breathing apparatus or a combination full-facepiece pressure-demand supplied-air respirator with auxiliary self-contained air supply. In the preamble to the final Respiratory Protection Standard, OSHA discussed extensively its rationale for requiring that employees breathe air consisting of at least 19.5 percent oxygen. The following excerpt, taken from the preamble, explains the basis for this requirement:
Human beings must breathe oxygen . . . to survive, and begin to suffer adverse health effects when the oxygen level of their breathing air drops below [19.5 percent oxygen]. Below 19.5 percent oxygen . . . , air is considered oxygen-deficient. At concentrations of 16 to 19.5 percent, workers engaged in any form of exertion can rapidly become symptomatic as their tissues fail to obtain the oxygen necessary to function properly (Rom, W., Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2nd ed.; Little, Brown; Boston, 1992). Increased breathing rates, accelerated heartbeat, and impaired thinking or coordination occur more quickly in an oxygen-deficient environment. Even a momentary loss of coordination may be devastating to a worker if it occurs while the worker is performing a potentially dangerous activity, such as climbing a ladder. Concentrations of 12 to 16 percent oxygen cause tachypnea (increased breathing rates), tachycardia (accelerated heartbeat), and impaired attention, thinking, and coordination (e.g., Ex. 25-4), even in people who are resting.

Nancy Pelosi on Sunday June 28, 2020 said that a federal mandate on wearing masks is “long overdue” as the country experiences a surge in coronavirus cases.

Pelosi said that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended the use of masks to reduce the spread of the virus but never mandated it as to “not offend” President Donald Trump, who has consistently refused to wear a mask.

Hmmm...
WHAT ABOUT ALL THE TENS OF MILLIONS OF RIOTERS, LOOTERS, MURDERS, MEMBERS OF ANTIFA - BLACK LIVES MATTER WHO OVER THE LAST FEW MONTHS AFTER THE KILLING OF ONE BLACK MAN, GEORGE FLOYD, WHO HAVE DESTROYED HUNDREDS OF AMERICAN CITIES, MURDERED AND INJURED THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT AMERICANS, THE DESTRUCTION OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE.

A FEW OF THE "THUGS" WORE FACE MASK TO HIDE THEIR IDENTITY, BUT MOST WERE TIGHTLY PACKED LIKE SARDINES IN A CAN AND WORE NO MASK WHILE THEY DESTROYED MONUMENTS AND PROPERTY, CAUSED HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS TO TRILLIONS OF DAMAGE TO BUSINESSES, PROPERTY.

PUBLIC OFFICIALS "KISSING THE ASSES OF ANTIFA AND BLACK LIVES MATTER" - NOTE: THESE SAME PUBLIC OFFICIALS DO NOT CARE ABOUT THE LIVES OF HARD WORKING TAX PAYING, LAW ABIDING AMERICAN CITIZENS.

Nancy says Mask wearing has become a point of contention across the U.S., despite research showing that face-coverings prevent coronavirus transmission.

Pelosi said that a federal mandate on wearing masks is “long overdue,” as state governors call for a consistent national message on the issue amid a surge in coronavirus cases across the nation.
Pelosi said that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended the use of masks to reduce the spread of the virus but never mandated it as to “not offend” President Donald Trump, BUT Nancy DID NOT MENTION THE DEMOCRAT PARTY, RINO'S AND TENS OF MILLIONS OF RIOTERS, LOOTERS, MURDERS, MEMBERS OF ANTIFA - BLACK LIVES MATTER WHO ARE IN THE PROCESS OF DESTROYING THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA...
Another STUPID statement from Pelosi: “The president should be an example. Real men wear masks, be an example to the country, wear a mask,” Pelosi said in an interview on ABC’s “This Week.” “It’s not about protecting yourself, it’s about protecting others.” BUT Nancy DID NOT MENTION THE DEMOCRAT PARTY, RINO'S AND TENS OF MILLIONS OF RIOTERS, LOOTERS, MURDERS, MEMBERS OF ANTIFA - BLACK LIVES MATTER WHO ARE IN THE PROCESS OF DESTROYING THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA...