Monday, September 30, 2019

Greta Thunberg Needs HELP! (Video - 2nd Picture - Press Arrow)

Greta Thunberg Needs HELP! (Video - 2nd Picture - Press Arrow)



CLICK ON THE ARROW ON THE PICTURE BELOW TO WATCH VIDEO - AFTER VIDEO STARTS, CLICK IN SQUARE AT BOTTOM RIGHT OF THE VIDEO BOX TO WATCH FULL SCREEN:


If you are going to give a speech in front of the United Nations, then you have officially opened your ideas up for debate even if you are just a kid. It’s pathetic that grown adults are using Greta as a human shield for their outrageous ideas, especially given the emotional distress she is clearly experiencing.

A match made in liberal heaven. It's sad and pathetic how the Democrats will use innocent children to push their socialist agenda. What's even worse is when a child like mini AOC or the Covington boys stand up against their socialist agenda or come out as a Trump supporter these Democrats think they have a right to completely destroy their future but when Republicans go after a child like @gretathunberg or ©davidmi|eshogg then we should be ashamed of ourselves.




Greta Thunberg's Parents

Greta Thunberg mother, Malena, is a singer in Sweden and her father, Svante, is an actor. Neither is very successful. So in order to gain international fame, they decided to exploit their teenage daughter.


Greta is on the autistic spectrum, has an anxiety disorder, is mentally undeveloped, and only regurgitates what adults have told her. Now her parents have put her in a position to be endlessly

ridiculed on National TV and Social media. So, if you want to criticize Greta Thunberg, don’t. These are the two you should attack.



Greta Thunberg is just a mouthpiece for her radicalized parents. They have selfishly thrown their daughter to the wolves, while at the same time receiving bumps in their failing entertainment careers. Don’t attack an ignorant, naive teenager. These people are the ones abusing their child mentally for financial gain.


Candace Owens Eviscerates White Dems Lecturing Her on White Supremacy – ‘I’ve Been Black in America My Whole Life’

Candace Owens Eviscerates White Dems Lecturing Her on White Supremacy – ‘I’ve Been Black in America My Whole Life’


You know who could use a lecture on white supremacy? A black chick.
So arguably believed participants in a House Oversight Committee hearing Wednesday, wherein white witnesses schooled Candace Owens on the subject.
But Candace had a thing or two to say back.
Not only did she rip the people tellin’ her stuff, but Democrats in general for being so obsessed by race and making it the issue of every election:
“I’ve been black in America my whole life, all 30 years, and I can tell you that you guys have done the exact same thing every four years we have an election cycle and it needs to stop.”
So what exactly is white supremacy? Earlier in the exchange, Candace offered an answer:
“It’s a fringe occurrence that is being used in my opinion by Democrats to scare Americans into giving up their votes to a party that can no longer win based on simple ideas, which is why we’re seeing so many of these hearings back-to-back despite other threats that are facing this nation. I want to reiterate that point. White supremacy is real, just as racism is real, but neither of these ideologies are real in this room. They have become mechanisms for the Left to continue to call these hearings and to distract from much bigger issues that are facing this country and which threaten minorities, much bigger issues that they are responsible for.”
Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) to @kathleen_belew: "The audacity of you to bring up the Christchurch shooting manifesto and make it seem as if I laughed at people that were slaughtered by a homicidal maniac is in my opinion absolutely despicable.

More: https://cs.pn/30g3eHN 
19.7K people are talking about this
Candace then turned the conversation toward a breakdown of the family, in her view bolstered by the very people claiming to be on the side of the black community:
“White nationalism sounds a lot better as a threat than father absence. When are we going to call a hearing on the 74 percent of single motherhood rate in black America today? My guess is probably never, since Democrats are the author of that epidemic, which leaves us – black Americans – 20 times more likely to end up in prison, nine times more likely to drop out of high school, and five times more likely to lead a life in poverty and to commit crime.”
That didn’t sit well with the University of Chicago’s Dr. Kathleen Belew, who The Daily Beast describes as “a professor and historian who’s researched the rise of the white power movement.”
She went about tellin’ Candace what’s what in the realm of Klannish behavior:
“I just have to say that I object strenuously to your use of the word ‘hilarious.’ To me, this feels a lot like your reaction to being named in one of these manifestos. Now, you’re of course not responsible for the words of somebody writing that document. But I do think that laughing at it is a real problem, because these are real families that are impacted by this violence. And I think that our efforts toward talking about this have to start from a place of mutual respect, which is what I’ve heard from this side of the table. Now, the reason we don’t have those numbers, I want those numbers as much as you do, but to say the numbers don’t show something is simply not supported by the data.”
As noted by The Daily Wire, Democratic Maryland Rep. Jamie Raskin asked for clarification from Kathleen:
“You reject the idea that it’s something that doesn’t matter, or it doesn’t really matter?”
“Absolutely reject,” she replied.
But Republican North Carolina Rep. Mark Meadows came to Candace’s defense:
“Ms. Owens, obviously this is a gang-up on you; we’re giving these witnesses the ability to do a rebuttal on you. And so, I find it unfair, Ms. Belew; candidly, for you to show ‘mutual respect’ and then go after Ms. Owens, it’s not appropriate. So Ms. Owens, you can have four minutes and thirty-four seconds to respond however you like.”
Candace explained it isn’t that racism doesn’t matter; it’s that there are other things that “matter much, much, much, much more…”
Hit it, Candace:
“I said that in my opening, and I will say it again: you know that white supremacy and white nationalism is nowhere near, ranks nowhere near the top of the issues that are facing black America. And the reason you are bringing them up in this room is because it is an attempt to make the election all about race as the Democrats do.”
Boil the pot a little more:
Jamie: “Not in my case, Ms. Owens.”
Owens (frustrated): “Please don’t cut me off.”
Mark: “Mr. Chairman, it’s my time.”
Jamie: “You’ve got your time. Mr. Meadows, I’ll give you three more seconds.”
Then Candace went off, Jack:
“Every four years you bring up race, and you knew exactly what I meant when I said ‘hilarious.’ You just tried to do live what the media does all the time to Republicans, to our president, and to conservatives, which is you try to manipulate what I said to fit your narrative, okay? I was not referring to the subject matter that is ‘hilarious.’ I said that it’s hilarious that we are sitting in this room today and I’ve got two doctors and a Mrs. and nobody can give us real numbers that we can respond to so that we can assess how big of a threat this is, because you know that it is not as big of a threat as you are trying to make it out to be so you can manipulate. And the audacity of you to bring up the Christchurch shooting manifesto and make it seem as if I laughed at people who were slaughtered by a homicidal maniac, is in my opinion absolutely despicable. I think that we should be above that. To try to assign responsibility or any meaning to a homicidal maniac writing a manifesto, which, by the way, also cited Spyro the Dragon, the child’s cartoon; he also cited Nelson Mandela as a source of inspiration. I don’t think that Nelson Mandela has inspired mosque shootings; you can correct me if you think I’m wrong.
“You would rather assign meaning to a homicidal maniac than to actually address the things that I said that are actually harming black America; number one: father absence; number two: the education system and illiteracy rate. Illegal immigration ranks high; abortion ranks high; white supremacy and white nationalism, if I had to make a list of one hundred things, would not be on it.
“This hearing, in my opinion, is a farce, and it is ironic that you’re sitting her and you’re having three Caucasian people testify and tell you what their expertise are. You want to know what my expertise are? Black in America. I’ve been black in America my whole life, all 30 years, and I can tell you that you guys have done the exact same thing every four years we have an election cycle and it needs to stop.”
Source: https://www.redstate.com/alexparker/2019/09/21/candace-owens-eviscerates-white-dems-lecturing-white-supremacy-i’ve-black-america-whole-life/?ve-black-america-whole-life/?utm_source=rsmorningbriefing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&bcid=510a37d5c1467835e54832ab27cef3df

Sunday, September 29, 2019

Prosecutor Who Claims to Have Evidence of 2016 Democratic Collusion Denied Entry into the United States

Prosecutor Who Claims to Have Evidence of 2016 Democratic Collusion Denied Entry into the United States


The narrative that President Trump is willing to collude with foreign powers in order to win elections is one that the left has refused to give up. With the Russian collusion story proven baseless, House Democrats are now pushing for impeachment over entirely unproven allegations that Trump colluded with Ukraine to gather opposition research on Joe Biden.

According to one Ukranian prosecutor, though, it isn’t Trump who colluded with Ukraine, but rather the Democratic party – and he’s said to have the evidence to prove these claims.

The only problem is that this prosecutor is now being denied entry into the United States by the Obama-appointed US ambassador to Ukraine.

Kostiantyn Kulyk, deputy head of the Prosecutor General’s International Legal Cooperation Department and one of Ukraine’s top law enforcement officials told The Hill’s John Solomon, “We were supposed to share this information during a working trip to the United States. However, the [U.S.] ambassador blocked us from obtaining a visa. She didn’t explicitly deny our visa, but also didn’t give it to us.”

The story that Kulyk claims he has evidence to support is a significant one. According to Kulyk, a certain company with strong ties to the Democratic party was involved in a money-laundering operation that saw large amounts of cash move from the United States to Ukraine. Kulyk says that these payments were authorized “for lobbying efforts directed at the U.S. government.”
In addition to this, Kulyk also claims to have evidence that Obama administration officials pressured the Ukranian National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) during the 2016 election to hide payments that were made to an unnamed Democrat.

“In the course of this investigation, we found that there was a situation during which influence was exerted on the NABU, so that the name of [the American] would not be mentioned,” Kulyk said.

Finally, Kulyk claims to have sworn statements from two Ukranian officials saying that their agency was responsible for leaking an alleged ledger that showed payments being made to Paul Manafort – who was Trump’s campaign manager at the time.

According to their statements, this ledger was leaked in a direct effort to sabotage Trump’s campaign and was also carried out with direct guidance from DNC operative Alexandra Chalupa.
The list of damning evidence against the Democratic party that Kulyk claims to possess goes on and on, including evidence that Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, was paid millions of dollars in unexplainable money transfers as well as evidence that Joe Biden used his influence as vice president to force the termination of the Ukranian prosecutor who was set to investigate the issue.

The irony that House Democrats are moving forward with impeachment proceedings over a single phone call that Trump had with Ukraine’s president when there seems to be so much evidence that it is the DNC who are actually guilty of colluding with Ukraine is overwhelming.

Yet so long as the US ambassador to Ukraine – the Obama-appointed Marie Louise Yovanovitch – continues to deny Kulyk’s visa, the DOJ will have no opportunity to see the evidence that Kulyk claims to have.

Nevertheless, by pursuing impeachment over Trump’s conversation with the president of Ukraine, House Democrats have opened up Pandora’s box when it comes to Ukrainian collusion. If they continue down this path, there is no stone that won’t be uncovered, and Kulyk will almost certainly get the opportunity to present the evidence of Democratic collusion that he claims to have.

For now, though, it’s important to take Kulyk’s testimony with a grain of salt in order to avoid making the same mistake as the Democratic Party by rushing into unproven allegations of collusion. With that said, however, Kulyk’s testimony is already much stronger evidence of collusion than anything House Democrats have put forward so far as their reasons for moving ahead with impeachment proceedings.

As is so often the case, it now seems that the Democratic party is guilty of the exact crime they are trying to accuse President Trump of committing.
If even half of what Kulyk has alleged turns out to be true and verifiable, the Democratic Party’s attempts to impeach Trump on charges of colluding with Ukraine will backfire in the most dramatic way possible.

Source: https://www.americanlibertyreport.com/articles/prosecutor-who-claims-to-have-evidence-of-2016-democratic-collusion-denied-entry-into-the-united-states/